Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Lin et al v. Mayorkas et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Mei Yan Lin, Cheng Kai Wu and Cheng Wei Wu
Defendant:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and Kirt Thompson
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hsin v. City of New York
as 18-751
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Henry Hang Hsin, Cheng Wei Hsin, Laludia Management Inc. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
City of New York, Rick D. Chandler, P.E., Dennis Burkart and others
Defendant:
Jane and John Does, Nos 1-10
Hsin et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv03795
Plaintiff:
162 Realty Management LLC, 43 162 St. Management, Inc., A & J Consulting Management Inc. and others
Defendant:
Dennis Burkart, Rick D. Chandler, P.E., Massimo Dabusco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Richemont International SA, et al. v. Liang
as 1:2016cv01227
Plaintiff:
Richemont International SA , Cartier International A.G. , Montblanc-Simplo GMBH and others
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Luo Liang, 170008559lin min and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Coach, Inc. et al v. Does 1-100
as 1:2012cv08963
Plaintiff:
Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-100 doing business as the aliases identified on Schedule "A", Lin Feng, Natasha Kawas and others
Garnishee:
Hongsong Deng
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Xiao Wei v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-3338
Petitioner:
XIAO CHENG WEI
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Zheng v. Holder
as 11-3727
Petitioner:
Cheng Wei Zheng
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Yang Wei v. U.S. Attorney General
as 11-11925
Petitioner:
YANG CHENG WEI
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:1996cv08229
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
