Cases 1 - 10 of 15
In Re: Cheryl A. Wolf and Raym
as 21-2929
Petitioner:
Cheryl A. Wolf, United States, Ex Rel and Raymond J. Fallica, United States, Ex Rel
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Wolfe v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02057
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Cheryl K. Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cheryl Wolf, et alIn re: Cheryl Wolf, et al
as 19-5291
Not Yet Classified:
In re: Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Wolf et al. v. United States
as 2:2019cv02100
Petitioner:
Mary Piscitello, Raymond J. Fallica and Cheryl A. Wolf
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Wolf et al. v. United States
as 1:2019cv00696
Petitioner:
Mary Piscitello, Raymond J. Fallica and Cheryl A. Wolf
Respondent:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Wolf v. Federal Bureau of Investigatio
as 18-796
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Respondent - Appellee:
Federal Bureau of Investigation
Wolf et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 1:2018dp20000
Plaintiff:
Cheryl A Wolf and Ronald Wolf
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolf et al v. US Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 1:2016cv09436
Petitioner:
Cheryl A. Wolf, Raymond J. Fallica and Mary Piscitello
Respondent:
US Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Wolf v. Town of Southampton New York
as 13-4100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cheryl A. Wolf
Defendant - Appellee:
Town of Southampton New York, Joseph A. Salvi, Esq., Cheryl Crohan and others
Wolf v. D.O.J. Office Professional Re
as 13-750
Petitioner - Appellant:
Cheryl A. Wolf and Raymond J. Fallica
Respondent - Appellee:
D.O.J. Office Professional Responsibility and U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
