Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Moroney et al
as 1:2023cv01299
Plaintiff:
Denzel Walker
Defendant:
Donald Moroney, . Wessels, . Kolthoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Archer v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 1:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Andre Archer
Defendant:
Wexford Health Source Inc, Andrew Tilden, Cheryl Hanson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Hanson et al
as 1:2019cv01182
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Defendant:
Nurse Jane Doe, Andrew Tilden, Chief Judge John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Long et al
as 1:2019cv01084
Plaintiff:
William Buck
Defendant:
Lt Long, Emily Ruskins, Michael Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck v. Long et al
as 3:2019cv00294
Defendant:
Ms Sharon Simpson, Lt Long, Emily Ruskins and others
Plaintiff:
William Buck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Buck et al v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv02125
Plaintiff:
William Buck and John Doe
Defendant:
Lt Long, Hunzicker, C/O Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2017cv00382
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Hanson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv05219
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Colasurdo v. Hanson et al
as 1:2017cv01215
Plaintiff:
John Colasurdo
Defendant:
Cheryl Hanson, Wexford Health Sources Inc, Andrew Tilden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Utah Board of Pardons & Parole, et al
as 09-4225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LANCE CONWAY WOOD
Defendant - Appellee:
UTAH BOARD OF PARDONS & PAROLE, UBPP, KEITH HAMILTON, in his individual and official capacity as Chairman of UBPP, JESSE GALLEGOS, In his individual and official capacity as a Member of UBPP and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
