Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Powell et al v. Revlon Consumer Products Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv09573
Defendant:
Beauty Bell Enterprises LLC, Revlon Consumer Products Corporation, Revlon Group Holdings LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Powell and Estate of Dorsey Mae Lakes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv04181
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Powell
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pruitt v. Vaughn et al
as 4:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Pruitt
Defendant:
Kenneth Vaughn, John Coleman and Cheryll Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pruitt v. Vaughn et al
as 6:2012cv00021
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Pruitt
Defendant:
Kenneth Vaughn, John Coleman and Cheryll Powell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv04636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03516
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03513
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv03500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
v. Halbig
as 2:2009cv01509
Defendant:
Kevin Halbig, Navajo Co. Sheriff's Office, Gary Butler and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Halbig
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Halbig v. Navajo County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2009cv08124
Plaintiff:
Kevin Halbig
Defendant:
Navajo County Sheriff's Office, Gary Butler, K. C. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
