Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Wallace et al v. Kartchner et al
as 4:2021cv00334
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace and James J Burchette
Defendant:
Branden Kartchner, Pima County Attorney's Office, Pima County Public Defenders Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Lynch et al
as 3:2014cv00383
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace
Defendant:
Jerry Lynch, Ricky Bunch, Pressley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Cannon et al
as 3:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace
Defendant:
Anna Cannon, Doug Cook and Ricky Bunch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace v. Jordan et al
as 1:2013cv00156
Plaintiff:
Chester L. Wallace
Defendant:
Carolyn Jordan, Arvil Chapman, F/N/U Skagg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadiq Abdul-Salim v. Darren Settles, et al
as 13-5837
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SADIQ HAFIZ ABDUL-SALIM, aka Chester L. Wallace
Defendant - Appellee:
REUBEN HODGE, individually and oficially, DARREN SETTLES, individually and officially, TONY HOWERTON, Warden and others
Chester Wallace v. Lt. Haveman, et al
as 12-6174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHESTER L. WALLACE
Defendant - Appellee:
LT. HAVEMAN, Hamilton County, CO. WILLIAMSON, Hamilton County, SGT. TERRELL, Hamilton County and others
Sadiq Abdul-Salim, et al v. Ron Turner, et al
as 12-5562
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SADIQ HAFIZ ABDUL-SALIM, also known as Chester L Wallace
Plaintiff:
YAHYA BILAL MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ, also known as Jonathan F.L. Davis
Defendant - Appellee:
RON TURNER, et al
Wallace v. Haveman et al
as 1:2009cv00030
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace and Travis J Evans
Defendant:
Haveman, Williamson, Terrell and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wallace v. Carlton et al
as 2:2007cv00246
Plaintiff:
Chester L Wallace
Defendant:
Howard Carlton, Joseph Shepherd, Steve Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
