Cases 1 - 10 of 59
Plaquemines Prsh v. ConocoPhillips
as 23-30303
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated, Exxon Mobil Corporation, As Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Chevron U.S.A. Inc., As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company and others
Plaquemines Prsh v. BP America Prod
as 23-30294
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management, Thomas F. Harris, Secretary
Defendant / Appellant:
BP America Production Company, As Successor in Interest to Amoco Production Company, Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, L.P., Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Chevron Oil Company, The California Company and Gulf Oil Corporation and others
Plaquemines Parish v. Chevron USA
as 23-30290
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaquemines Parish
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Louisiana State, ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and Louisiana State, through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
Chevron USA, Incorporated, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Oil Corporation and The California Company, ConocoPhillips Company, As Successor in Interest to Conoco, Incorporated and Chevron Pipe Line Company, As Successor in Interest to Gulf Refining Company
Jefferson Parish v. Exxon Mobil
as 23-30227
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Jefferson Parish and Louisiana State, Ex Rel Parish of Jefferson
Intervenor / Appellee:
Louisiana State, through the Department of Natural Resources, Office of Coastal Management and its Secretary, Thomas F. Harris and Louisiana State, Ex Rel. Jeff Landry Attorney General
Defendant / Appellant:
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Named as Successor in Interest to Exxon Corporation, The Superior Oil Company, and Humble Oil and Refining Company, Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, L.L.C., Named as Successor in Interest to The Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated, Named as Successor in Interest to Texaco, Incorporated and others
Parish of Cameron v. BP America Prod
as 23-30056
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Parish of Cameron
Intervenor Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, ex rel, Jeff Landry and State of Louisiana, on behalf of Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, on behalf of Office of Coastal Management, on behalf of Thomas F. Harris
Defendant / Appellant:
BP America Production Company, Chevron Pipe Line Company, Chevron USA Holdings, Incorporated and others
Roberts v. Chevron Pipe Line Company
as 2:2021cv00427
Plaintiff:
Jeffery G. Roberts
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rich Land Seed Co Inc et al v. Memphis Light Gas & Water et al
as 3:2021cv01865
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Co, Memphis Light Gas & Water, Marathon Oil Co and others
Plaintiff:
Rich Land Seed Co Inc and State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rich Land Seed Co Inc. v. B L S W Pleasure Corp et al
as 3:2021cv01070
Defendant:
C H Cuatro, Chevron Pipe Line Co, Loe Oil & Gas Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
Rich Land Seed Co., Inc., State of Louisiana and Rich Land Seed Co Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Louisiana et al v. Davison Transportation Services L L C et al
as 5:2021cv00990
Defendant:
Chevron Pipe Line Co, Davison Transportation Services, LLC, Texas Eastern Transmission L P and others
Plaintiff:
State of Louisiana, Tyler J Wallace, Tamra R Wilchelns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01440
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
