Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Stephens et al v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
David Stephens and Kaitlyn Strawn
Defendant:
Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Carroll v. Chick-fil-a, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv00314
Plaintiff:
Keith Carroll and Rebeka Rodriguez
Defendant:
Chick-fil-a, Inc.
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2022cv81443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
UKPERE v. CHICK-FIL-A, INC.
as 2:2022cv05397
Plaintiff:
SUSAN UKPERE
Defendant:
CHICK-FIL-A, INC.
Not Classified By Court:
HON. DAVID A. GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pittman v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
as 22-1862
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Aneisha Pittman
Plaintiff:
Susan Ukpere
Defendant / Appellee:
Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
Goldstein v. Chick-Fil-A, Inc.
as 1:2022cv21897
Plaintiff:
Ronald Goldstein
Defendant:
Chick-Fil-A, Inc. and Ron Goldstein
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02332
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
3Rd Party Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sanderson Farms, Inc., et al v. Amory Investments LLC, et al
as 22-8007
Petitioner:
SANDERSON FARMS, INC., PERDUE FARMS, INCORPORATED, FOSTER FARMS, LLC and others
Respondent:
AMORY INVESTMENTS LLC, CAMPBELL SOUP COMPANY, CAMPBELL SOUP SUPPLY COMPANY, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022at00421
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
