Cases 11 - 19 of 19
SWARTZFAGER v. OIL CITY CHIEF OF POLICE et al
as 2:2013cv00655
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW R. SWARTZFAGER
Defendant:
OIL CITY CHIEF OF POLICE, OIL CITY MAYORS OFFICERS, OFFICER STACKS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01766
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
POSEY v. SWISSVALE BOROUGH et al
as 2:2012cv00955
Plaintiff:
HERMAN POSEY, JR.
Defendant:
SWISSVALE BOROUGH , JOHN A. CORRADO, JR. , JOHN R. MERCALDE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORENO et al v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00615
Plaintiff:
GEORGEIA MORENO , DARLENE STAYMATES and MARK STAYMATES
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MICHAEL REDDY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
KENNEY v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH et al
as 2:2012cv00551
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY KENNEY
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, CHIEF OF POLICE NATHAN HARPER, OFFICER MATTHEW TURKO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
EVERLY v. OPERATIONS OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR et al
as 2:2012cv00147
Plaintiff:
DAMON RUSSELL EVERLY
Defendant:
OPERATIONS OF THE CITY ADMINISTRATOR, ESQ. IT'S SOLICITOR and IT'S DIRECTION CHIEF OF POLICE MCKEESPORT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KREMPASKY-PROCTOR v. WILKINSBURG BOROUGH et al
as 2:2010cv01755
Plaintiff:
MICHELE KREMPASKY-PROCTOR
Defendant:
WILKINSBURG BOROUGH and WILKINSBURG CHIEF OF POLICE, OPHELIA COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
HUNDLEY v. ZIEGLER et al
as 2:2007cv00848
Plaintiff:
RAPHAEL DWIGHT HUNDLEY
Defendant:
DONALD E. ZIEGLER, JACQUELINE R. MORROW, MAYOR OF CITY OF PITTSBURGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
