Cases 1 - 10 of 111
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
PHINISEE v. GRAHAM-PARKER et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
RASHEENA PHINISEE
Defendant:
CRNP KATI GRAHAM-PARKER, RANDOLPH MATTHEWS, HANNAH CRAMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv04905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Providence St. Joseph Health et al v. Actavis Holdco US, Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv03636
Plaintiff:
Astera Health, Providence St. Joseph Health, UPMC and others
Defendant:
ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC., ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
MILES et al v. CHILDRENS HOSPITAL et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
CECIL JOE MILES and MARY ELIZABETH BENITEZ
Defendant:
CHILDRENS HOSPITAL, MONONGAHELA POLICE DEPARTMENT and CHILDREN YOUTH SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
