Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Rosalez v. Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv11209
Plaintiff:
China Rosalez
Defendant:
Godrej SON Holdings, Inc., Namaste Laboratories, LLC., and Strength of Nature, LLC.
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American with Disabilities Act
Nasir v. Equinix, Inc., et al.
as 26-5732
Plaintiff:
SAJJAD NASIR, I
Defendant:
EQUINIX, INC., NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK, LTD. and CHINA UNITED NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS GROUP CO., LTD.
Salazar et al v. China International Marine Containers (Group) Co., Ltd. et al
as 3:2026cv09548
Plaintiff:
Rey Salazar and Andrew Baker
Defendant:
China International Marine Containers (Group) Co., Ltd., CIMC USA, Inc., Shanghai Universal Logistics Equipment Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv05716
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv09412
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv03020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1101 Immigration and Nationality Act
Qunzhu et al v. China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec) et al
as 1:2026cv07342
Plaintiff:
Li Qunzhu and Li Li
Defendant:
China Petroleum & Chemical Corporation (Sinopec), Petrochina Company Limited (Petrochina) and Sinopec Research Institute of Petroleum Processing Co., Ltd (RIPP)
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 26 Suit for injunctive relief re violation antitrust laws
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
