Cases 1 - 10 of 21
NISBET v. ELLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00430
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA R NISBET and JOSHUA LIBBY
Defendant:
ROB ELLIS, STEVE WEBSTER, CHRIS TODD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AMANDA STRAND FITNESS LLC v. PARK EXERCISE GROUP et al
as 1:2022cv00396
Defendant:
HYUN J PARK, PARK EXERCISE GROUP, CHRIS PARK and others
Plaintiff:
AMANDA STRAND FITNESS LLC a Maine Limited Liability Company doing business as FREEDOM GROUP EXERCISE and AMANDA STRAND FITNESS LLC doing business as FREEDOM GROUP EXERCISE
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00176
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
LARSEN v. LINTHICUM et al
as 1:2020cv00127
Defendant:
CHRIS BECK, JOHN HIATT, JARED CARNEY and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN LARSEN, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRENDELL v. STATE OF MAINE et al
as 1:2019cv00419
Defendant:
JEREMY CARON, JOHN DOE, ROBERT BURKE and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL S GRENDELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHASE v. MERSON et al
as 2:2018cv00165
Plaintiff:
JOHN F CHASE
Defendant:
ARTHUR MERSON, ENDEAVOR PROJECT CONSULTANTS LLC, CHRISTOPHER M OCHOA and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
INMAN v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DA CHRIS ALMY
as 1:2017cv00412
Petitioner:
FRANK INMAN
Respondent:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE DA CHRIS ALMY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DIMOULAS v. ALMY
as 1:2017cv00048
Plaintiff:
ANTONIOS N DIMOULAS
Defendant:
CHRIS ALMY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. BEZOS et al
as 1:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JEFF BEZOS, AMAZON.COM INC , TOUCHPANTS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
POWELL v. USA
as 1:2015cv00430
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
CHRIS POWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
