Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Zeiler et al v. Peoria County et al
as 1:2024cv01139
Plaintiff:
Christopher Zeiler and Heidi Zeiler
Defendant:
Peoria County, Sheriff Chris Watkins, Allen Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Beasley v. Stark et al
as 1:2024cv01104
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
. Stark, Kristie Hart, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01105
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Brian Johnson, Kristie Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Turner et al
as 1:2024cv01086
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Chris Watkins, Brian Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beasley v. Fitzgerald
as 1:2024cv01067
Plaintiff:
Shiloe Beasley
Defendant:
Carmisha Turner, Brian Johnson, Carri Roe Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Watkins
as 1:2023cv01313
Petitioner:
Timothy Henderson
Respondent:
Chris Watkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Blakes v. Watkins
as 1:2023cv01312
Petitioner:
Rev Blakes
Respondent:
Chris Watkins
Interested Party:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shiloe Beasley v. Carmisha Turner, et al
as 23-2535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SHILOE BEASLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CARMISHA TURNER, BRIAN JOHNSON and CHRIS WATKINS
Custer v. Hoffman et al
as 1:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Chris Hoffman, . Anderson, . Stark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
