Cases 1 - 10 of 311
Locatell v. Locatell
as 2:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Christian Locatell
Respondent:
Holly Joy Locatell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 11601 Int'l Child Abduction Remedies Act (Hague Conventn)
Resendiz v. Christian et al
as 1:2024cv02452
Plaintiff:
Diana Resendiz
Defendant:
Officer Demetrius Christian, Clayton County, Georgia and John Doe(s) 1-3
Levy v. Hagood et al
as 4:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Charles Christian Levy
Defendant:
A. Hagood and Department of Community Supervision of Chatham County, GA (State)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
REDMOND et al v. DUPREE et al
as 5:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
JACQUELINE REDMOND and JENNIFER THOMAS
Defendant:
ANTHONY DUPREE, CHRISTIAN MAKALIN TURNER, GARY LONG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Scott v. Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Christian D. Scott
Defendant:
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Christian v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv01904
Plaintiff:
Leah Christian
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01842
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
WHITEHEAD v. T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC et al
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
LILLIAN MARIE WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
T E A M LOGISTICS SYSTEMS INC and CHRISTIAN EPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
MCCLENDON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
CHRISTIAN MCCLENDON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
