Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellogg v. Aguilera et al
as 5:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Timothy James Kellogg
Defendant:
Tony Aguilera, Jace Gilley, Cole Jack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cantrell v. White
as 4:2024cv00018
Petitioner:
Christy Cantrell
Respondent:
Tamika White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Broken Arrow, City of et al
as 6:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Harold Price
Defendant:
Broken Arrow, City of, Michael Spurgeon, Kenneth Schwab and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
King v. State of Oklahoma et al
as 5:2023cv01141
Plaintiff:
Carey M King, Tearra King, Deoyon Janae Moore and others
Defendant:
Charles King, Cannady Paries, Deoyonte Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David v. Hodges et al
as 6:2023cv00405
Defendant:
Angela Cacey, FNU Fisk, Dustin Hodges and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome Adrian David
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. et al v. Gasoliq Solutions, LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00447
Plaintiff:
Advance Research Chemicals, Inc. and Inhance Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Gasoliq Solutions, LLC, Parimal Christie, Navin Mathur and others
Rich v. Baird et al
as 5:2023cv00883
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Stephens County, Dexter Lawley, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lay v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00326
Petitioner:
Wade Lay
Respondent:
Christie Quick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
