Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Blanchard v. King et al
as 9:2022cv00608
Plaintiff:
Charles Edwin Blanchard
Defendant:
Sgt. King, C.O. Feliciano, Adam C. Christon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Leuze et al
as 1:2021cv02075
Defendant:
PO Glorimar Duran, PO Carlisle, PO Sose and others
Plaintiff:
Jannil Christon-Scorpi Sheppard
Interested Party:
Corporation Counsel For The City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sheppard v. Leuze et al
as 1:2021cv02656
Defendant:
PO Glorimar Duran, PO Carlisle, PO Sose and others
Plaintiff:
Jannil Christon-Scorpi Sheppard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fore v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv10201
Plaintiff:
Christon Fore
Defendant:
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sheppard v. Glover et al
as 1:2013cv06188
Plaintiff:
Jannil Christon-Scorpi Sheppard
Defendant:
W. Glover, X. Santamaria, F. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Christon v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv05401
Plaintiff:
Phillip Christon
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Ronald Sanchez and Police Officer Justin Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jean et al v. FLOWER CITY MONITORS, INC. et al
as 6:2012cv06198
Plaintiff:
Christon Jean , ZACHARIE JEAN , RALF STEVENS and others
Defendant:
FLOWER CITY MONITORS, INC. and LENORA PAIGE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Aurelien v. Artus et al
as 1:2010cv00300
Plaintiff:
Jonathan S. Aurelien
Defendant:
Dale Artus, Max Patnode, Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York v. Denis et al
as 1:2008cv03049
Plaintiff:
United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
Defendant:
Mary Denis and Nicholas Christon
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
