Cases 1 - 10 of 17,656
Berger v. State Of Alabama et al
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
State Of Alabama, FEB Bancshares, Inc., 22nd State Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. Wolpert et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Leonard English, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher M. Wolpert, David Tighe, Jerome A. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hooper v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER DORIEN HOOPER
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01897
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Christopher Tipton v. Charles LaPrade, et al
as 24-11314
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LAMAR TIPTON
Defendant:
CHARLES LAPRADE and ANTHONY
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
McMillian v. Babb
as 3:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Christopher McMillian
Respondent:
Sheriff Babb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
as 1:2024cv01878
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jose Adams
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Topin v. Riviello et al
as 1:2024cv01819
Plaintiff:
Christopher Topin
Defendant:
Stephanie N. Riviello, Aleksandar Mimic, Biljana Mimic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
