Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Christopher Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections
as 09-7309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
SC DEPT OF CORRECTIONS, JON OZMINT, SC DEPT PROBATION PAROLE AND PARDON SERVICES and others
Jones v. Jones
as 7:2009cv00089
Plaintiff:
David D. Jones and David D. Jones
Defendant:
Christopher W. Jones
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones v. Bennett et al
as 5:2009cv00025
Plaintiff:
Christopher N. Jones
Defendant:
Boyd Bennett, Keith Whitener, FNU Baker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Christopher Jones v. Perry Luthi, Sr.
as 08-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER BERNARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
PERRY S. LUTHI, SR., DESMINE SARDINE, LUTHI MORTGAGE COMPANY, INCORPORATED and others
Jones v. SC Dept of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
SC Dept of Corrections , Jon Ozmint , SC Dept Probation Parole and Pardon Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. South Carolina General Assembly et al
as 6:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina General Assembly, Mark Sanford, SC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. South Carolina General Assembly et al
as 7:2007cv01876
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bernard Jones
Defendant:
South Carolina General Assembly, Mark Sanford, SC Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Jones v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv00020
Plaintiff:
Christopher L. Jones
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McDonnell v. Jones
as 4:2007cv00044
Plaintiff:
Matthew Everett McDonnell
Defendant:
Christopher Neal Jones and Southlake Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
