Cases 101 - 110 of 437
Ellis v. Jones et al
as 3:2012cv00893
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Ellis
Defendant:
McQua Jones and Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Carbin v. Christopher Epps, et al
as 12-60960
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER CARBIN
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and DAVID C. FATHI, A.C.L.U.
Weatherspoon v. Sparkman et al
as 4:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
David Weatherspoon
Defendant:
E. L. Sparkman, M.D.O.C., Christopher B. Epps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 3:2013cv00988
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pruitt v. Epps et al
as 4:2012cv00187
Plaintiff:
Cecil Pruitt, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps and Jim Hood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Grant v. Christopher Epp
as 12-60913
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER B. EPPS, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 3:2013cv00980
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
Unknown Wimdal , John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team et al
as 4:2012cv00175
Plaintiff:
Marcus J. Johnson
Defendant:
CERT (MCT) a.k.a Black Team, Unknown Dykes, Unknown Wimdal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charles Torns, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 12-60850
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES TORNS, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
MALCOLM E MCMILLIN, Sheriff for Hinds County, BARBARA DUNN, Hinds County Circuit Court Clerk, HINDS COUNTY SUPERVISOR and others
Gilmore v. Epps
as 3:2012cv00717
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Gilmore
Defendant:
Christopher B. Epps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
