Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff: Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant: City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tapp v. I.G.R.C. John Doe et al
as 6:2020cv07072
Defendant: C.O. John Doe, Head Nurse Administrator 7-3, I.G.R.C. John Doe and others
Plaintiff: Sean E. Tapp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baker v. Berryhill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv01759
Plaintiff: Christopher Baker
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Defendant: Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc
Baker v. The State of New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2018cv01048
Respondent: Deborah McCulloch and The State of New York
Petitioner: Christopher Baker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pape v. Stamford et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv00863
Defendant: City of Stamford , Christopher Baker and Steven Perrotta
Plaintiff: Richard G. Pape
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urbanksa v. Baker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01975
Plaintiff: Anna Urbanksa
Defendant: Christopher Baker, Christopher Broems, Peter Malanga and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Baker et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00739
Plaintiff: Christopher Baker and Stephanie Baker
Defendant: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract None
Pomponi et al v. Baker et al
as 3:2009cv00753
Plaintiff: Jeffrey Pomponi and Bonnie Pomponi
Defendant: Christopher Baker, Peter Malanga, Richard Stoebel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?