Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Colbert v. Guerrerro
as 26-10325
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Colbert v. Guerrero et al
as 6:2026cv00079
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Respondent:
Eric Guerrero, John Lopez, Odell Banker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Guerro et al
as 9:2025cv00210
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Eric Guerro, Donald Muniz, FNU Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Guerro et al
as 7:2025cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Eric Guerro, Donald Muniz, FNU Murphy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Smith, et al.
as 7:2025cv00073
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Kevin Smith and Debbie Kelley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2025cv00184
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2025cv00165
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2025cv00166
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2025cv00167
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Colbert v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2025cv01413
Petitioner:
Christopher Brian Colbert
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
