Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Burgis v. New York City Department of Sa
as 14-1640
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Andrenia Burgis, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Christopher Burgos, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated, Leticia Smith, on their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly situated and others
Defendant:
John Does, 1-10
Defendant - Appellee:
New York City Department of Sanitation and John J. Doherty
Alban v. Diamond State Financial Group LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Alicia S. Alban
Defendant:
Diamond State Financial Group LLC and Christopher Burgos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Burgos v. Semple et al
as 3:2013cv01205
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burgos
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Stevens and Quieves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Semple et al
as 3:2013cv01207
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burgos
Defendant:
Scott Semple, Angeloupolis and Fargo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Torres
as 3:2013cv01204
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burgos
Defendant:
Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgos v. Angeloupolis et al
as 3:2013cv01206
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burgos
Defendant:
Angeloupolis, Marguis and Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burgis et al v. Department of Sanitation City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01011
Plaintiff:
Andrenia Burgis , Christopher Burgos , Leticia Smith and others
Defendant:
Department of Sanitation City of New York , John J. Doherty and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burgo v. C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
as 6:2012cv00705
Plaintiff:
Donald Christopher Burgo
Defendant:
Warden C Paul Phelps Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ehrenreich v. Burgos et al
as 6:2010cv01013
Plaintiff:
Daniel Elliot Ehrenreich
Defendant:
Christopher Burgos , Holly Anne Bryan , Jerry L. Demings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
