Cases 1 - 10 of 61
McClure v. Lumpkin
as 26-40194
Plaintiff:
Robert Troy McClure
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Executive Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, Warden Carter, Todd Allen and others
Ellis v. Nassau County et al
as 2:2026cv02041
Plaintiff:
Christopher Ellis
Defendant:
Nassau County, Detective Richard Wells, Detective George Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Old Second National Bank v. Printed Mint LLC et al
as 1:2026cv03810
Plaintiff:
Old Second National Bank
Defendant:
Printed Mint LLC, Christopher Ellis and Mary Zychowski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Abastta et al v. The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as 2:2025cv12495
Plaintiff:
Crystal Abastta, Daniel Aloia, Laurie Arevalo and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Abastta et al v. The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co. et al
as SC/2:25-cv-12495
Plaintiff:
Crystal Abastta, Daniel Aloia, Laurie Arevalo and others
Defendant:
The 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Goodman v. Bouzy
as 25-2037
Plaintiff:
JASON GOODMAN, -
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS BOUZY, BOT SENTINEL, INC., GEORGE WEBB SWEIGERT and others
USA v. Christopher Ellis
as 25-5459
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
USA v. Christopher Ellis
as 25-5456
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
USA v. Christopher Ellis
as 25-5458
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
USA v. Christopher Ellis
as 25-5457
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER ELLIS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
