Cases 1 - 10 of 14
England v. Dudley et al
as 8:2023cv01472
Plaintiff:
Christopher England
Defendant:
Christopher Dudley, Clayton Andrew Coquyt, Samantha A. Skidmore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
England v. State of Florida
as 8:2022cv02412
Plaintiff:
Christopher England
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Robert England
as 21-5273
Defendant / Appellant:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ENGLAND
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Kelley et al v. Harrison et al
as 1:2021cv00056
Plaintiff:
Janet May and Randy Kelley
Defendant:
Christopher England, Democratic Party of the United States of America, State Democratic Executive Committee of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
ENGLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv01857
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHRISTOPHER ENGLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ENGLAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56639
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ENGLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Daly, Jr. et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11780
Plaintiff:
Michael Gavroy, Gerard Finegan, Michael P Giacoppo and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
England v. Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
as 2:2016cv03184
Plaintiff:
Christopher England
Defendant:
Administrators of the Tulane Educational Fund
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
