Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Doe v. Anne Arundel County et al
as 1:2023cv03451
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Anne Arundel County, Christopher Klein, Amanda Tabor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
BELOUS v. GANNON, et al
as 2:2019cv06186
Defendant:
ILYA BELOUS, Sergeant JOHN DOE DAVIDSECK, Dr. JOHN DOE AND NURSES JANE DOE 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Carter v. Klein
as 1:2017cv00573
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Layton Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Klein
as 1:2017cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Klein and Perry Phelps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fisher, Jr. v. Parker et al
as 1:2017cv00254
Plaintiff:
James R. Fisher, Jr.
Defendant:
Philip Parker, Christopher Klein, Cordero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Klein
as 1:2017cv00170
Plaintiff:
Jermaine L. Carter
Defendant:
Christopher Klein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Biggins v. Robert Burns, et al
as 14-4582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
ROBERT M. BURNS, BERRY BURNMAN, JOHN BURTON and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER CESSNA, RONALD L. WILEY, JAMES SCARBOROUGH and others
Kevin Brathwaite v. Warden James T Vaughn Correcti, et al
as 14-1750
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN C. BRATHWAITE
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JAMES T VAUGHN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, CHRISTOPHER KLEIN and others
Donald Parkell v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 14-1667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD D. PARKELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CARL DANBERG, Commissioner of Prisons, in his individual and official capacities, WARDEN PERRY PHELPS, in his individual and official capacities, DEPUTY WARDEN DAVID PIERCE, in his individual and official capacities and others
James Biggins v. Carl Danberg, et al
as 13-1498
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ARTHUR BIGGINS
Defendant:
CARL C. DANBERG, THOMAS L. CARROLL, MIKE DELOY and others
Not Party:
DR. CLAUDIA PARKER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
