Cases 1 - 10 of 45
United States v. Christopher Howard
as 26-2109
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher A. Howard
Wadleigh v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2025cv01504
Plaintiff:
Christopher John Howard Wadleigh and ChristopherJohn Howard Wadleigh
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Howard v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
as 3:2025cv00562
Plaintiff:
Christopher G. Howard
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Howard v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 5:2024cv03102
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bryant Howard
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Social Security Administrative Record and US Attorney - Social Security Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
HOWARD v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2022cv04216
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL HOWARD
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Christopher Howard v. USA
as 22-1328
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Howard v. Anthony Wills, et al
as 21-2582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER J. HOWARD
Defendant / Appellee:
ANTHONY WILLS and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Howard v. Warden
as 3:2021cv00719
Defendant:
Warden and USA
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Howard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv16030
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER D HOWARD
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOWARD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv08173
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER W HOWARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.