Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Lowry v. Ellis et al
as 3:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Defendant:
Heather Ellis, Arrin Parks, Dana Marks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christopher Lowry-RojasIn re: Christopher Lowry-Rojas
as 23-12183
Petitioner:
In re: CHRISTOPHER LOWRY-ROJAS
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
LOWRY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10433
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowry v. Dixon et al
as 3:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Dixon, Shore and Eikenberry
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lowry-Rojas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv00863
Respondent:
Florida Attorney General, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Petitioner:
Christopher Lowry-Rojas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lowry v. Baker et al
as 3:2018cv00224
Respondent:
Rene Baker and Nevada Attorney General
Unknown:
Adam P. Laxalt and Adam P. Laxalt
Petitioner:
Christopher Lowry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberts v. Straughn et al
as 5:2014cv00098
Plaintiff:
Brunson Roberts
Defendant:
William Straughn, Maurice Williams, Justine Minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Lowry v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, NA
as 12-4222
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER LOWRY
Defendant - Appellant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, NA
Lowry v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 4:2012cv00816
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Lowry v. LegalZoom.com, Inc.
as 4:2011cv02259
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowry
Defendant:
LegalZoom.com, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
