Cases 1 - 10 of 21
United States of America v. Boykin (McLean)
as 25-1986
Defendant:
ANTHONY BOYKIN, PAUL ARLINE, JOSEPH MCLEAN and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Boykin (Jacklyn)
as 24-1817
Defendant:
SEAN COTTON, ANTHONY BOYKIN, RAHSAAN MELVIN and others
:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Holland v. Jonsen
as 4:2024cv00421
Petitioner:
Christopher Melvin Holland
Respondent:
Sheriff Robert Johnson and Shefiff Robert Jonsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Holland v. Clark
as 4:2022cv01912
Petitioner:
Christopher Melvin Holland
Defendant:
Ken Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States of America v. Boykin (Brice)
as 21-2794
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Boykin, AKA Double O, Paul Arline, AKA Face, Joshua Arnold and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Brice, AKA Reack
MELVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv32732
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MELVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv24552
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER MELVIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Funches v. Hermeyer et al
as 1:2020cv01429
Defendant:
Alan Pasley, Mark Delia, John Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Perez C. Funches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Funches v. Hermeyer et al
as 3:2020cv50088
Defendant:
Alan Pasley, Mark Delia, John Craft and others
Plaintiff:
Perez C. Funches
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hanson et al v. Larimer County et al
as 1:2020cv00317
Defendant:
Neil Baker, Stephen Wicker, Stephen (I) Wicker and others
Plaintiff:
Rosma Lynn Walker, Brett Alan Hanson and The Estate of Dorothy Evenlyn Felt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
