Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Scott v. BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
BigBear.ai Holdings, Inc., Peter Cannito, Sean Battle and others
Scott v. Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Cerevel Therapeutics Holdings, Inc., N. Anthony Coles, Ron Renaud and others
Scott v. New Relic, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01130
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
New Relic, Inc., William Staples, Lewis Cirne and others
Geoffrey Scott v. Attorney General United States of America
as 23-2697
Petitioner:
GEOFFREY HOWARD CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott v. Prometheus Biosciences, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
Prometheus Biosciences, Inc., Mark C. McKenna, Helen C. Adams and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00804
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
DOUTT v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 2:2023cv01859
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT and JOSHUA L. DOUTT
Respondent:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Scott v. UserTesting, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott
Defendant:
UserTesting, Inc., Andrew MacMillan, Darrell Benatar and others
Hargett v. Infor (US), Inc.
as 1:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Hargett
Defendant:
Infor (US), Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
SCOTT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv05691
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
