Cases 1 - 10 of 13
NetChoice v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 26-1962
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas, Todd Murray, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas, Sonia Eileen Fonticiella, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
NetChoice v. Tim Griffin, et al
as 26-1096
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas, Todd Murray, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas, Sonia Eileen Fonticiella, In their official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Southern Legacy of Life et al v. Jester et al
as 4:2025cv00773
Plaintiff:
Southern Legacy of Life and Julie Barber
Defendant:
Cole Jester, Tim Griffin, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Fayetteville Public Library, et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas, et al
as 25-2427
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, a political subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, State of Arkansas, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, in his official capacity as the Crawford County Judge, Todd Murray, each in his or her official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas
NetChoice v. Griffin et al
as 5:2025cv05140
Plaintiff:
NetChoice
Defendant:
Tim Griffin, Todd Murray, Sonia Fonticiella Hagood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fayetteville Public Library, et al v. Todd Murray, et al
as 25-2211
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, a political subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, State of Arkansas, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, in his official capacity as the Crawford County Judge, Todd Murray, each in his or her official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas
Fayetteville Public Library, et al v. Todd Murray, et al
as 25-1146
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, a political subdivision in the City of Fayetteville, State of Arkansas, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, in his official capacity as the Crawford County Judge, Todd Murray, each in his or her official capacity as a prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Intervenor:
Tim Griffin, In his official capacity as Attorney General of Arkansas
Bio Gen LLC, et al v. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, et al
as 23-3237
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC, doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Governor; in her official capacity, Tim Griffin, Attorney General; in his official capacity, Todd Murray, in his official capacity as prosecuting attorney for the State of Arkansas and others
Bio Gen LLC et al v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2023cv00718
Plaintiff:
Bio Gen LLC, Drippers Vape Shop LLC, Cigarette Store LLC doing business as Smoker Friendly and others
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, John Timothy Griffin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Fayetteville Public Library et al v. Crawford County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05086
Plaintiff:
Fayetteville Public Library, Eureka Springs Carnegie Public Library, Central Arkansas Library System and others
Defendant:
Crawford County, Arkansas, Chris Keith, Todd Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
