Cases 1 - 8 of 8
United States of America v. Jordan (Acevedo)
as 26-153
Defendant:
KEITH JORDAN, BRIAN HANNA, KATINA REED and others
Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
PAGAN v. SOLOMAN et al
as 2:2024cv03463
Petitioner:
JESUS CHUITO PAGAN
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF: PENNSYLVANIA and BOBBI JO SOLOMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Jordan (Santos)
as 22-1714
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Pedro Santos, AKA Primo
United States of America v. Jordan (Hayes)
as 21-3005
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Keith Jordan, AKA Knowledge, Brian Hanna, AKA Zo, Katina Reed, AKA Tina and others
Defendant / Appellant:
James Tyrone Hayes, AKA Ty
United States of America v. Cambrelen (Rivera)
as 21-2871
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Ryan Cambrelen, AKA Bolo, Joel Vasquez, Francisco Sepeda, AKA Shorty, AKA Eddie Brown, AKA Fransizco Sepeda and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Alberto Rivera, AKA Alberto, AKA Jose A Rivera
US v. Miranda-Rojas
as 21-1845
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
HECTOR MIRANDA-ROJAS, a/k/a Chuito, a/k/a Pito Shell
United States of America v. Jordan (Lopez)
as 20-3996
Defendant:
Kent Jordan, AKA KJ, AKA Curtis, Domingo Alves, AKA Mingo, Timothy Booker, AKA Book and others
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Francisco Lopez
Victor Chin Martinez et al v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00205
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Ellington Abrego, Roberto Garay Abrego, Efrain Degracia Arjona and others
Defendant:
Chiquita Brands Company, North America, Chiquita Brands International, Inc., Chiquita Brands, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
