Cases 21 - 30 of 33
CIFUENTES v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00053
Plaintiff:
FELIPE CIFUENTES
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIE G. MAFFETT v. CITY OF EVANSVILLE et al
as 3:2013cv00023
Plaintiff:
KYLE ANDERSON, LARRY A ANDERSON, JEREMY BIRDWELD and others
Defendant:
CITY OF EVANSVILLE, COUNTY OF VANDERBURGH, NICHOLAS HERMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cifuentes v. United States of America
as 1:2012cv21972
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Cifuentes
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Walter Cifuentes v. Aref Fakhoury
as 5:2012cv00197
Petitioner:
Walter Cifuentes
Respondent:
Aref Fakhoury
Cifuentes-Becerra v. USA (2255 - 2:10-cr-0151 GEB)
as 2:2011cv03230
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Carlos Cifuentes-Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cifuentes v. Calderon et al
as 6:2010cv00485
Plaintiff:
Diomedes Cifuentes, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlos Calderon, James Meyn, Will McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cifuentes v. Dart et al
as 1:2009cv04156
Plaintiff:
Mark Cifuentes
Defendant:
Thomas Dart, Salvador Godinez, D Moreci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cifuentes v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2009cv03937
Plaintiff:
Mark Cifuentes
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Chicago Police Department, Peter A. Magnine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cifuentes v. Calderon et al
as 6:2008cv01817
Plaintiff:
Diomedes Cifuentes, Jr.
Defendant:
Carlos Calderon, James Meyn, Will McCurdy and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Asturias-Cifuentes v. Clark et al
as 2:2008cv01392
Petitioner:
Claudia Asturias-Cifuentes
Respondent:
Neil Clark and Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
