Cases 1 - 10 of 1,399
Turnbull v. Board of Directors
as 24-50260
Plaintiff:
Edward Turnbull, IV
Defendant:
Board of Directors of the State Bar of Texas, Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Office of the Chief Disciplinary Counsel and others
Kotler v. Torres
as 24-879
Plaintiff:
KERRY KOTLER
Defendant:
PEDRO TORRES, DAISY RODRIGUEZ, JOHN DOE #1 and others
Walsh v. Transphorm, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ryan Walsh
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc., Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
Smith v. Transphorm, Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00371
Plaintiff:
Tara Smith
Defendant:
Transphorm, Inc, Primit Parikh, Umesh Mishra and others
Stanfill-EL v. Bay et al
as 3:2024cv00496
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Stanfill-EL
Defendant:
Melissa Bay, Department of PVARO Vocation Rehabilitation, Gary Richardson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mejia-Huete, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1626
Petitioner:
CINDY MEJIA-HUETE and JULISSA JARQUIN-MEJIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hunter v. Paterson, et al.
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
DAVID SAMPSON HUNTER
Defendant:
STATE MEDIA PERPETRATORS, RICK ALFREAD MANDEVILLE, SCOTT JONES and others
Assoc. for Govt. Acc., et al v. Steve Simon, et al
as 24-1410
Plaintiff:
Association for Government Accountability, Mark Koran, Senator, Calvin Bahr, Senator and others
Defendant:
Steve Simon, individually and in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, or his successor and David Maeda, individually and in his official capacity as Director of Elections for State of Minnesota, or his successor
Appellant:
Wisconsin Voter Alliance
Orrick v. ARstrat LLC
as 3:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Cindy Orrick
Defendant:
ARstrat LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
