Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Shaw v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00011
Plaintiff:
William S. Shaw
Defendant:
Katherine Strange and Cindy Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shaw v. The Lee County Sheriff Dept. et al
as 2:2022cv00793
Plaintiff:
Williams S. Shaw and William S. Shaw
Defendant:
The Lee County Sheriff Dept., Katherine Strange and Cindy Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J&J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Torres et al
as 8:2018cv01001
Plaintiff:
J&J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Cindy Torres and Ruth Melgar
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 605
Bartto Cottom et al v. D&A Medical Care, PLLC. et al
as 1:2017cv00907
Plaintiff:
Jasmin Bartto Cottom and Cindy Torres
Defendant:
D&A Medical Care, PLLC. and Sergey Voskresenskiy
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Corning Mobileaccess, Inc. v. Cindy Torres, et al
as 14-11605
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CORNING MOBILEACCESS, INC.
Defendant - Appellant:
CINDY TORRES, REACH HOLDINGS, LLC and SOLID TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Chalas Cordero v. Holder
as 14-247
Petitioner:
Diana Chalas Cordero, AKA Diana Chalas, AKA Cindy Torres
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Corning Mobileaccess, Inc. v. Torres et al
as 1:2013cv24463
Plaintiff:
Corning Mobileaccess, Inc.
Defendant:
Cindy Torres , Reach Holdings, LLC and Solid Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
United States of America v. Lopez
as 12-1019
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Tomislav Yutronic, Jairold Gomez, AKA Flaco, Cindy Torres, AKA Sindy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Harold Lopez
Torres v. USA
as 1:2011cv08397
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Cindy Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Lopez (Abad)
as 11-164
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harold Lopez, Jairold Gomez, AKA Flaco, Cindy Torres, AKA Sindy and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Wilson Abad, AKA The Lawyer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
