Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv06555
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Citibank (South Dakota) NA v. Hunter
as 2:2011cv01441
Petitioner:
Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Respondent:
David Hunter
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Berry v. Hotels.com LP et al
as 3:2011cv00535
Plaintiff:
Pamela C Berry
Defendant:
Hotels.com LP and Citibank (South Dakota) NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Laura Hoffman v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55106
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
C. PRADA, S. SOYKA and HOWARD STRONG
Objector:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Defendant:
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Laura Hoffman, et al v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55085
Plaintiff - Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Objector - Appellant:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Objector:
C. PRADA
Defendant:
CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA) NA
Laura Hoffman, et al v. Citibank (South Dakota) NA
as 11-55085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
LAURA HOFFMAN, an individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Appellant:
JOSEPH BALLA, ANDREW J. CESARE and TODD BATES
Other:
C. PRADA
Defendant:
CITIBANK SOUTH DAKOTA NA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01576
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
