Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Schipke v. Connecticut et al
as 3:2017cv02087
Plaintiff:
Mary Elizabeth Schipke
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, City Of Meriden, Meriden Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingwell v. Cossette et al
as 3:2017cv01531
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dingwell, Sr.
Defendant:
Jeffry Cossette , John Williams and City Of Meriden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Gaynor et al
as 3:2017cv01101
Defendant:
Patrick Gaynor and City of Meriden and Jeffrey Cossette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01103
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Gaynor et al
as 3:2017cv01102
Defendant:
Patrick Gaynor and City of Meriden and Jeffry Cossette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Meriden Police Department
as 17-1081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Derrick Bryant
Defendant - Appellee:
Kenneth Egan, Officer, (I/O) and John Slezak, Officer, (I/O)
Defendant:
Meriden Police Department, Dexton Palmer, Officer, (I/O), John Ceregio, Officer, (I/O) and others
Bryant v. Meriden Police Department
as 17-1039
Plaintiff - Appellee-Cross-Appellant:
Derrick Bryant
Defendant:
Meriden Police Department, Dexton Palmer, Officer, (I/O), John Ceregio, Officer, (I/O) and others
Defendant - Appellant-Cross-Appellee:
Kenneth Egan, Officer, (I/O) and John Slezak, Officer, (I/O)
Marshall v. City of Meriden
as 17-747
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kerry L. Marshall
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Meriden, Jeffry W Cossette, Chief in his individual capacity, Robert Pekrul, Sergeant in his individual capacity and others
Defendant:
John Doe, in his individual capacity
Nealy v. Meriden et al
as 3:2017cv00033
Defendant:
City Of Meriden , John Williams , Mennone and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Nealy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anziano v. Lespier et al
as 3:2016cv01283
Plaintiff:
David A. Anziano
Defendant:
Steve Lespier , Jeffry Cossette , Daniel McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
