Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Winningham v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, Lanny and Leon Rademacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dulaney v. City of Broken Arrow
as 4:2023cv00527
Plaintiff:
Randy Dulaney
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dulaney v. City of Broken Arrow
as 4:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
Randy Dulaney
Defendant:
City of Broken Arrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Merrill v. Fell, et al
as 23-7018
Plaintiff / Appellee:
RYAN TYLER MERRILL
Defendant / Appellant:
GREG FELL
Defendant:
JONATHAN SEAGRAVES, CITY OF BROKEN ARROW and BRANDON BERRYHILL
Winningham v. LNU et al
as 4:2022cv00466
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Defendant:
Lanny LNU, Leon Rademacher, City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams County, PA, et alIn re: Adams County, PA, et al
as 22-3653
Not Classified By Court:
In re: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION
Petitioner:
ADAMS COUNTY, PA, LOWER MAKEFIELD TOWNSHIP, PA, ARMSTRONG COUNTY, PA and others
Winningham v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2022cv00177
Defendant:
Beth Shaw, City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, City of Sallisaw, Oklahoma and others
Plaintiff:
John W Winningham, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hubbard v. City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2021cv00159
Defendant:
Robert C Motley, Officer Gibson and City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Plaintiff:
Richard Eugene Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Winningham v. City of Broken Arrow, et al
as 21-7004
Defendant / Appellee:
T. JESSE, Broken Arrow Police Patrol, BROKEN ARROW POLICE, CITY OF BROKEN ARROW and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN W. WINNINGHAM, JR.
Friedman v City of Broken Arrow Oklahoma, The et al
as 4:2020cv00562
Defendant:
John Doe, 2, John Doe, 3, John Doe, 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Joel R Friedman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
