Cases 1 - 8 of 8
City of Evergreen, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
as 1:2018op45422
Plaintiff:
City of Evergreen, Alabama
Defendant:
Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc., AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Evergreen, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
as ALS/1:18-cv-00121
Plaintiff:
City of Evergreen, Alabama
Defendant:
ACTAVIS LLC , Actavis Pharma, Inc. f/k/a Watson Pharma, Inc. , Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation and others
City of Evergreen, Alabama v. Purdue Pharma, L.P.
as 1:2018cv00121
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Evergreen, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Evergreen, Alabama v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00216
Defendant:
BP Exploration & Production, Inc., BP America Production Company, BP p.l.c. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Evergreen, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 33 U.S.C. § 1365 Environmental Matters
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00107
Plaintiff:
Dan Allen , Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant:
The City of Evergreen, Alabama , Pete Wolff, III , Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Dan Allen, Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant:
The City of Evergreen, Alabama, Pete Wolff, III, Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Allen et al v. The City of Evergreen, Alabama et al
as 1:2012cv00496
Plaintiff:
Dan Allen , Bobby Watkins and Alberta Lee
Defendant:
The City of Evergreen, Alabama , Pete Wolff, III , Luther Upton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salter v. Booker et al
as 1:2012cv00174
Plaintiff:
Brenda Salter
Defendant:
Edwin Booker , Tyrone Boykin, M. A. Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
