Cases 1 - 10 of 14
JME Building And Development, LLC v v. The City of Fairhope, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00293
Plaintiff:
JME Building And Development, LLC v
Defendant:
The City of Fairhope, Alabama, The City Council of The City of Fairhope, Alabama, Jimmy Conyers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00047
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Johnson v. City of Fairhope, Alabama et al
as 1:2016cv00595
Plaintiff:
Eric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
City of Fairhope, Alabama , Stephanie Hollinghead , Shane Nolte and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tina Windham v. City of Fairhope, Alabama, et al
as 14-12475
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA DIANE WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA, TRENT SCOTT, DAMIAN REHORN and others
:
SERVICE
Tina Windham v. City of Fairhope, et al
as 14-12473
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TINA DIANE WINDHAM
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAIRHOPE, TRENT SCOTT and DAMIAN REHORN
:
SERVICE
Windham v. City of Fairhope et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Plaintiff:
Tina Diane Windham
Defendant:
City of Fairhope , Trent Scott , Damian Rehorn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Murray Lawrence v. City of Fairhope, Alabama, et al
as 11-15788
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MURRAY G. LAWRENCE
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAIRHOPE, ALABAMA and WENDELL THOMAS
Byrd v. City of Daphne, Alabama et al
as 1:2011cv00468
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Ragel Byrd
Defendant:
City of Daphne, Alabama, City of Fairhope, Alabama, Donald Bettner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson et al v. City of Fairhope et al
as 1:2011cv00310
Plaintiff:
Dorsey Henderson and Dorris L. Henderson
Defendant:
City of Fairhope and Trent Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
