Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Anderson et al v. City of Gloversville
as 1:2019cv01241
Plaintiff:
James C. Anderson, David C. Rackmyre and Robert Davis
Defendant:
City of Gloversville
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Fonda v. City of Gloversville, New York et al
as 6:2012cv00214
Plaintiff:
Pamela Fonda
Defendant:
City of Gloversville, New York, City of Gloversville Police Department, Edgar Beaudin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Montano v. The City of Gloversville, New York et al
as 6:2012cv00057
Plaintiff:
Christopher Montano
Defendant:
The City of Gloversville, New York , The City of Gloversville Police Department , John H. Harzinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenney v. Clay et al
as 6:2011cv00790
Plaintiff:
Derek Kenney
Defendant:
Anthony Clay , James Lorenzoni , Edgar Beaudin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Fulton County Young Men's Christian Association, Inc. v. The City of Gloversville et al
as 6:2010cv00778
Plaintiff:
The Fulton County Young Men's Christian Association, Inc.
Defendant:
The City of Gloversville, The Planning Board of the City of Gloversville, The Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Gloversville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Androme Leather Corporation v. City of Gloversville
as 10-515
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Androme Leather Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Gloversville, Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Gloverville, D. Robert Robbins and others
Partlow v. The City of Gloversville et al
as 6:2008cv01046
Plaintiff:
Kyle Partlow
Defendant:
The City of Gloversville and The Gloversville Fire Department
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Margiotta v. City of Gloversville et al
as 6:2007cv00560
Plaintiff:
Gary T. Margiotta
Defendant:
City of Gloversville, Timothy Hughes, James Handy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
