Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Resto Valdez v. City of Mentor, et al
as 1:2021cv02000
Plaintiff:
Johannie Resto Valdez
Defendant:
Mentor City of, Mentor Police Department, Donald G Swindell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of Ohio ex rel et al v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2020cv02360
Defendant:
Mentor City Council, City of Mentor and Mentor Municipal Planning Commission
Plaintiff:
State of Ohio ex rel. Charles P. Bolton, William P. Bolton, and Bolton Properties, Ltd., Bolton Properties, Ltd., Charles P. Bolton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Andrews, Sr. v. City of Mentor, OH
as 20-4030
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHARLES M. ANDREWS, SR., Trustee of the Gloria M. Andrews Trust Dated April 23, 1998
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF MENTOR, OH
Andrews v. City of Mentor, Ohio
as 1:2020cv00058
Plaintiff:
Trustee Charles M Andrews and Charles M Andrews
Defendant:
City of Mentor, Ohio
Tisdale v. City of Mentor Ohio et al
as 1:2019cv02530
Defendant:
Mentor Municipal Court and City of Mentor Ohio
Plaintiff:
Venis Tisdale
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gresco v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2018cv02029
Plaintiff:
Kyle Gresco
Defendant:
City of Mentor, Ric Smith, Michael Danzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lombardo-Bruening v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2018cv01417
Plaintiff:
Diana Lombardo-Bruening
Defendant:
City of Mentor , Kevin Knight , Ken Gunsch and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Robinson v. City of Mentor et al
as 1:2016cv00976
Plaintiff:
Erick Robinson
Defendant:
City of Mentor, John Stirewalt and Heather Lnu
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv11050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Spehar v. City of Mentor Ohio et al
as 1:2012cv02855
Defendant:
Richard Hennig , City of Mentor Ohio , Mentor City Council Members and others
Plaintiff:
Martin E Spehar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
