Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00511
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
The Solid Waste Disposal Authority of the City of Mobile, Alabama v. WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00438
Defendant:
WM Mobile Bay Environmental Center, Inc. and Waste Away Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
The Solid Waste Disposal Authority of the City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Russell v. Cochran et al
as 1:2018cv00120
Plaintiff:
Cecil Lee Russell
Defendant:
Sam Cochran, Noah P. Oliver, Mobile County Sheriffs Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
City of Mobile, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2018op45076
Plaintiff:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Defendant:
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, Actavis LLC, Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
City of Mobile, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as ALS/1:17-cv-00564
Plaintiff:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation , Actavis, LLC , Actavis Pharma, Inc. and others
City of Mobile, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2017cv00564
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Mobile, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Martin v. City of Mobile et al
as 1:2017cv00145
Plaintiff:
George Martin
Defendant:
City of Mobile, Alabama, County of Mobile, Alabama, Thomas Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
