Cases 1 - 10 of 16
City of Dallas et al v. Disney DTC LLC et al
as 3:2022cv02071
Plaintiff:
City of Dallas, City of Abilene City of Abilene, City of Allen and others
Defendant:
Disney DTC, LLC, Hulu, LLC, Netflix, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ogbonna v. City of Nacogdoches
as 4:2021cv00296
Plaintiff:
Lindsey Ogbonna
Defendant:
City of Nacogdoches, Cardinal Street Housing, L.P. doing business as The Overlook at Nacogdoches and Josh Anders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The City of Nacogdoches, Texas et al
as 9:2021cv00071
Defendant:
The City of Nacogdoches, Texas, Josh Anders and The Overlook at Nacogdoches
Plaintiff:
Shannon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Agnew v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00242
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
Det Johnson, Don Barlow, Scott Weens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agnew v. Johnson et al
as 9:2017cv00110
Plaintiff:
Norman L Agnew
Defendant:
Det Johnson, Don Barlow, Scott Weens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hancock et al
as 9:2016cv00205
Plaintiff:
Theodore Thomas
Defendant:
E Hancock, Unknown Smith, Unknown Gilcrease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hancock et al
as 9:2014cv00171
Plaintiff:
Theodore Thomas
Defendant:
E Hancock, Officer Lee Smith, Unknown Gilcrease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Eggebrecht et al
as 9:2014cv00144
Defendant:
Brian Eggebrecht and City of Nacogdoches, Texas
Plaintiff:
LaVorris Johnson and Marvell Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Shelton et al
as 9:2014cv00059
Plaintiff:
Theodore Thomas
Defendant:
A Shelton, J Maisel, Detective Gilcrease and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-40360
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
