Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Stephens v. City of Parkersburg Sheriff Dept. et al
as 3:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Stephens
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg Sheriff Dept., Correction Officer John Allen, Correction Officer Tom Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richards v. Depue et al
as 2:2014cv16854
Plaintiff:
Albert Richards
Defendant:
B. J. Depue , R. T. Davis and City of Parkersburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sadler v. Hart et al
as 6:2013cv29542
Plaintiff:
John Sadler
Defendant:
Jay Hart, Michael Bosley, Joe Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kelly v. City of Parkersburg et al
as 6:2013cv23260
Plaintiff:
Charles Kelly
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg and Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backus v. City of Parkersburg, et al
as 6:2012cv02518
Plaintiff:
Joseph K. Backus
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg , Robert Newell and Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Seabolt v. Vensel
as 6:2012cv01891
Plaintiff:
Jerry Seabolt
Defendant:
Joshua A. Vensel, Joe Martin, Bob Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fraternal Order of Police Blennerhasset Lodge 79, Inc., et al, v. City of Parkersburg, et al
as 6:2012cv01856
Plaintiff:
Fraternal Order of Police Blennerhasset Lodge 79, Inc. and Chris Morehead
Defendant:
City of Parkersburg , Robert Newell and Joseph Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mazza v. Deuley, et al
as 6:2010cv00834
Plaintiff:
Timothy Michael Mazza
Defendant:
Nathan R. Deuley, M. W. Eichhorn, R. L. Koher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ratliff v. Wolfe et al
as 6:2010cv00797
Plaintiff:
Terry Ratliff
Defendant:
C. R. Wolfe, B. F. Ward, M. Randall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2009cv01311
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
