Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Jay Cooper, et al v. City of Plano, et al
as 11-40997
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY SANDON COOPER and TERESA WARD COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PLANO, THOMAS MUEHLENBECK, City Manager, City of Plano, MARK ISRAELSON, Assistant City Manager, City of Plano and others
Spikin v. City of Plano, Texas et al
as 2:2011cv00230
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas and Paul Malcom
Plaintiff:
Michelle Spikin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spikin v. City of Plano, Texas et al
as 4:2011cv00598
Defendant:
City of Plano, Texas and Paul Malcom
Plaintiff:
Michelle Spikin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jay Cooper, et al v. City of Plano, et al
as 11-40465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAY SANDON COOPER and TERESA WARD COOPER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PLANO, THOMAS MUEHLENBECK, City Manager, City of Plano, MARK ISRAELSON, Assistant City Manager, City of Plano and others
Richard Florance, Jr. v. Don Bush, et al
as 10-10803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD JOHN FLORANCE, JR., Individually and as Next Friend for A.F., A Minor
Defendant - Appellee:
DON BUSH, DAVID J MALAND, CAROLYN DINEEN KING and others
Pipes v. Dell Computers et al
as 4:2010cv00094
Plaintiff:
Steven Ray Pipes
Defendant:
Dell Computers, Trusswal, Parago, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Florance v. Bush et al
as 3:2009cv01470
Plaintiff:
Richard John Florance, Jr
Defendant:
Don Bush, David J. Maland, Carolyn Dineen King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Propes v. City of Plano Police Department et al
as 4:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Paul A. Propes, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Plano Police Department, City of Plano Texas and Kristina Knight
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Adrain v. Genetec Inc et al
as 2:2008cv00423
Plaintiff:
John B. Adrain, John B. Adrain and John B. Adrain
Defendant:
Genetec Inc, PIPS Technology, Inc, Elsag North America LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
