Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Pontiac, City of General Employees Retirement System v. First Solar Incorporated et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv00036
Plaintiff: Pontiac, City of General Employees Retirement System and City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System
Defendant: First Solar Incorporated, Mark Widmar, Alexander R Bradley and others
Strezsak v. Ardelyx Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2021cv05868
Plaintiff: Steven Strezsak
Defendant: Ardelyx Inc., Mike Raab and Justin Renz
Petitioner: Chad Bryant, Richard Bryant, City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
In re: Danaher Corp. Shareholder
as 21-7080
In Re: In re: Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation
Plaintiff / Appellant: City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System, Derivatively on Behalf of Danaher Corporation and Harry Markarian, Derivatively on Behalf of Danaher Corporation (20-2846)
Defendant / Appellee: Thomas P. Joyce Jr., Walter G. Lohr Jr., John T. Schwieters and others
City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System v. Reckitt Benckiser Group Plc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv10041
Defendant: Adrian Hennah, Shaun Thaxter, Adrian Bellamy and others
Plaintiff: City of Sterling Heights Police & Fire Retirement System, City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System and City of Pontiac General Employee's Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System v. Bush et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv06651
Defendant: Arun Sarin, Michael D. Capellas, Lisa Su and others
Plaintiff: City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System
CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. JOYCE JR. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02445
Defendant: DANAHER CORPORATION, THOMAS P. JOYCE JR., JOHN T. SCHWIETERS and others
Plaintiff: CITY OF PONTIAC GENERAL EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and HARRY MARKARIAN
Azar v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv07665
Defendant: Grubhub Inc., Matthew Maloney and Adam DeWitt
Plaintiff: Roei Azar
Petitioner: Hugues Gervat, City of Pontiac Police & Fire Retirement System, City of Pontiac General Employees' Retirement System and others
City Of Miami General Employees' & Sanitation Employees' Retirement Trust v. Venator Materials PLC et al
as 4:2019cv04266
Defendant: Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Douglas D. Anderson, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B.V. and others
Plaintiff: City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust
Petitioner: Fresno County Employees Retirement Association and City of Pontiac General Employees Retirement System
Cambria County Employees Retirement System v. Venator Materials PLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv03464
Defendant: Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Douglas D. Anderson, Huntsman (Holdings) Netherlands B.V. and others
Plaintiff: Cambria County Employees Retirement System, City of Miami General Employees & Sanitation Employees Retirement Trust, Fresno County Employees Retirement Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Edwards v. McDermott International, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2018cv04330
Plaintiff: Miriam Edwards, Public Employees' Retirement System of Mississippi, Wah Kee Ho and others
Defendant: McDermott International, Inc., David Dickson, Stuart Spence and others
Interested Party: Kingstown Capital Management, L.P.
Intervenor Plaintiff: Local 813 Insurance Trust Fund, the Local 813 Pension Trust Fund, and the Local 1034 Pension Trust Fund
Petitioner: Donald Piliero, Alfred Rodrigues, University of Puerto Rico Retirement System Trust Fund and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?