Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Hassen v. Bowman
as 25-30400
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, L.L.C., doing business as Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Hassen v. Bowman
as 24-30467
Defendant:
Jordan Richard, individually and in his official capactity, Stephen J. Rogers, individually and in his official capacity, C L H G-Ruston, L.L.C., doing business as Northern Louisiana Medical Center and others
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01027
Not Classified By Court:
City of Ruston Police Department
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Loyd v. Ruston et al
as 3:2022cv05809
Plaintiff:
Kayla D Loyd
Defendant:
City of Ruston, Steven J Rogers and Henry R Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
City of Ruston v. 3M Company, The
as 2:2021cv03333
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of Ruston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
City of Ruston v. 3M Company, The
as SC/2:21-CV-03333
Plaintiff:
City of Ruston
Defendant:
3M Company, The
Mehdi Abrahimia v. Frank Cordaro, et al
as 20-30487
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank M. Cordaro, Commissioner of Auctioneer, City of Ruston Building and Zoning and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mehdi Agha Abrahimia
Abrahimia v. Cordaro et al
as 3:2019cv01578
Defendant:
Frank M Cordaro, City of Ruston Building & Zoning, Commissioner of Real Estate and others
Plaintiff:
Mehdi Agha Abrahimia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
