Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01027
Not Classified By Court:
City of Ruston Police Department
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hassen v. Bowman et al
as 3:2023cv01026
Plaintiff:
LaBrittany Hassen
Defendant:
Chris Bowman, Hannah Bowman, A Plus Medical, LLC d/b/a Michael Brooks Family Clinic and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Loyd v. Ruston et al
as 3:2022cv05809
Plaintiff:
Kayla D Loyd
Defendant:
City of Ruston, Steven J Rogers and Henry R Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
City of Ruston v. 3M Company, The
as SC/2:21-CV-03333
Plaintiff:
City of Ruston
Defendant:
3M Company, The
City of Ruston v. 3M Company, The
as 2:2021cv03333
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Raytheon Technologies Corporation, AGC Inc and others
Plaintiff:
City of Ruston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mehdi Abrahimia v. Frank Cordaro, et al
as 20-30487
Defendant / Appellee:
Frank M. Cordaro, Commissioner of Auctioneer, City of Ruston Building and Zoning and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mehdi Agha Abrahimia
Abrahimia v. Cordaro et al
as 3:2019cv01578
Defendant:
Frank M Cordaro, City of Ruston Building & Zoning, Commissioner of Real Estate and others
Plaintiff:
Mehdi Agha Abrahimia
Williamira Scott Wright v. Dept of Treasury et al
as 2:2018cv05673
Defendant:
U.S.O.A. Veterans Affairs, Chase Bank, U.S. Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Williamira Scott Wright, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1818 FDIC
Campos v. Walker et al
as 3:2017cv01059
Plaintiff:
Rogelio David Campos
Defendant:
Ronnie Walker, Stephen Rogers, Clint Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins et al v. City of Ruston et al
as 3:2017cv00963
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Danielle Jenkins and Brittany Nicole Jenkins
Defendant:
City of Ruston and Police Dept City of Ruston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
