Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ballard v. City of West Hollywood, et al.
as 24-538
Plaintiff / Appellant: JAMES THOMAS BALLARD, individually, and as Trustee of the James T. Ballard Millennium Trust, dated January 9, 2002
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF WEST HOLLYWOOD, WEST HOLLYWOOD RENT STABILIZATION COMMISSION and others
James Ballard v. City of West Hollywood et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv04367
Defendant: City of West Hollywood and Does 1-10
Petitioner: City Council of The City of West Hollywood, West Hollywood Rent Stablization Commission and James Ballard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
KBS Holdco, LLC v. City of West Hollywood et al
as 2:2022cv05750
Plaintiff: KBS Holdco, LLC a California limited liability company doing business as Regency Outdoor Advertising
Defendant: City of West Hollywood and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Salaverria v. The United States of America
as 22-1190
Plaintiff / Appellant: Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant / Appellee: The United States of America, Department of Justice of the United States, Department of Homeland Security, (USDHS), Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Defendant: Retired Agent Jeffrey James Mumaugh, Under Cover, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, (ICE), Director Tae D. Johnson, All Arresting Officers, Present at Illegal Arrest, September 7, 2021 and others
Salaverria v. The United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv09254
Plaintiff: Alex Alfonso Salaverria
Defendant: The United States of America, Department of Homeland Security (USDHS), Unidentified Agents Acting in the name of USDHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1932 bv
Kenneth Gray v. County of Los Angeles et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv07685
Plaintiff: Kenneth Gray
Defendant: County of Los Angeles, Sheriff Alex Villanueva, City of West Hollywood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
California Grocers Association v. City of West Hollywood
as 2:2021cv01448
Plaintiff: California Grocers Association
Defendant: City of West Hollywood
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151
City and County of San Francisco et al v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04717
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara
Defendant: Acting Secretary of Kevin McAleenen, Department of Homeland Security, Acting Director Kenneth T. Cuccinelli and others
Petitioner: Community Healthcare Network, Presidents' Alliance on Higher Education and Immigration, America's Essential Hospitals and others
Amicus Curiae: The Cities of Los Angeles and Oakland, California; Harris County, Texas; and 26 Additional Cities, Counties, and Local Government Agencies, City of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, City of Seattle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
In Re: Kirstjen M. Nielsen
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Kevin McAleenan, Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
In Re: Elaine Duke
as 17-3345
Petitioner: Elaine C. Duke, Acting Secretary of Homeland Security, Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States and others
Respondent: Martin Jonathan Batall Vidal, Make the Road New York, Antonio Alarcon and others
Amicus Curiae: City of Los Angeles, California, City of Austin, Texas, City of Boston, Massachusetts and others
Movant: 6Sense Insights, Inc., A Medium Corporation, Adobe Systems Incorporated and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?