Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Okongo v. Santa Clara County et al
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Okongo Philip Michael and Phillip Michael Okongo
Defendant:
Santa Clara County, Santa Clara County Sheriff, Gonzalez Correctional Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Donald Renfro v. West Valley Detention Center et al
as 5:2021cv01414
Plaintiff:
Donald Renfro, III
Defendant:
West Valley Detention Center, Classification Staff, Custody Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonin Guzman v. The Orange County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 8:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Sgt Akino, Deputy C Boothe, Deputy Collugan and others
Possibly Aguire:
CSA Name Unknown Female
Plaintiff:
Antonin Guzman
Michael Jones v. M Wurm et al
as 5:2015cv00289
Defendant:
3 Unknown, Unknown Classification Officer, Unknown Classification Officer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Jones
Coleman v. Mims et al
as 1:2013cv00975
Plaintiff:
Mark Wayne Coleman, Jr.
Defendant:
Margaret Mims, Fresno County Jail Medical Facility and Classification Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Enrique Hernandez v. Classification Officer
as 2:2011cv01019
Defendant:
Classification Officer
Plaintiff:
Enrique Hernandez
Enrique Hernandez v. Classification Officer for R J Donovan Prison
as 2:2011cv00985
Respondent:
Classification Officer for R J Donovan Prison
Petitioner:
Enrique Hernandez
Rupe v. Catavich et al
as 1:2010cv01020
Plaintiff:
Steven David Rupe
Defendant:
J. Catavich, - Revera, S&E Baker yard officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferraro v. State of California et al
as 2:2009cv01721
Plaintiff:
Mercurino Ferraro, Mercurino Ferraro, Estate of Salvatore Ferraro and others
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Chief of Corrections of California Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
