Cases 41 - 50 of 1,037
Guerra Moza v. Garland
as 23-1157
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA MELISSA GUERRA MOZA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
THOMPSON v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023vv00885
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA THOMPSON
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Yates Ranch Property LLP et al v. Village of Wagon Mound, New Mexico et al
as 1:2023cv00496
Plaintiff:
Yates Ranch Property LLP and Jay Land Ltd. Co.
Defendant:
Village of Wagon Mound, New Mexico, Andres Martinez, Village of Wagon Mound Council and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moreland et al v. Pal of Mine Corp., et al
as 2:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
ANDRA CHERI MORELAND, CIELO JEAN GIBSON, CLAUDIA SAMPEDRO and others
Defendant:
PAOLA CANAS, PAL OF MINE CORP. d/b/a CLUB EMPIRE, John Does I-V and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Velazquez Sanchez v. Garland
as 23-837
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA VELAZQUEZ SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pinson v. Hayt, Hayt & Landau PL
as 2:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Claudia Pinson
Defendant:
Hayt, Hayt & Landau PL
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
USA v. Adrian Velasquez Figueroa, et al
as 23-11346
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ADRIAN JOSE VELASQUEZ FIGUEROA and CLAUDIA PATRICIA DIAZ GUILLEN
USA v. Claudia Diaz Guillen
as 23-11347
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CLAUDIA PATRICIA DIAZ GUILLEN
Claudia Granados-Ruiz v. Merrick Garland
as 23-1347
Petitioner:
CLAUDIA LOURDES GRANADOS-RUIZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General
Komatsu v. The City of New York
as 23-464
Petitioner:
Towaki Komatsu
Respondent:
City of New York, NYPD Officer Saquoi Harris, Shield #2350, NYPD Officer Steven Perez, Shield 23485 and others
Defendant:
NYPD Officer Rodriguez, NYPD Steve Ortiz, NYPD Jeffrey Peattie and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
