Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Hampton et al v. Cortez et al
as 3:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Rufus J. Hampton, III, Fred Johnson, Terry Mays and others
Defendant:
Patrick Page Cortez, Clay Schexnayder and John Bel Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Ardoin
as 22-30333
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Press Robinson, Edgar Cage, Dorothy Nairne and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Kyle Ardoin, in his official capacity as Secretary of State for Louisiana
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
Clay Schexnayder, Patrick Page Cortez and State of Louisiana - Attorney General Jeff Landry
Amicus Curiae:
State of Alabama, State of Arkansas, State of Georgia and others
Not Classified By Court:
James F. Blumstein
Galmon et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Edward Galmon, Sr., Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Defendant:
Kyle R Ardoin
Petitioner:
Clay Schexnayder, Patrick Page Cortez and State of Louisiana -Attorney General Jeff Landry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Press L Robinson, Sr, Edgar Cage, Dr. Dorothy Nairne and others
Defendant:
Kyle Ardoin
Not Yet Classified:
Edward Galmon, Sr., Ciara Hart, Norris Henderson and others
Petitioner:
State of Louisiana -Attorney General Jeff Landry, Louisiana Legislative Black Caucus and Vincent Pierre
Amicus Curiae:
Michael Mislove, Lisa J. Fauci, Robert Lipton and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Chairman LLBC Vincent Pierre
Intervenor Defendant:
Clay Schexnayder and Patrick Page Cortez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Nairne et al v. Ardoin
as 3:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Dr. Dorothy Nairne, Jarrett Lofton, Rev. Clee E. Lowe and others
Defendant:
R. Kyle Ardoin
Intervenor Defendant:
Clay Schexnayder and Patrick Page Cortez
Petitioner:
State Of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
